Friday, June 28, 2013

A query and explanations: on "The Essence"

I hereby share a query, evoked in and thus raised by, Sri. Ashok Kumar, on "The Essence," on the website: www.speakingtree.in, and the explanations that have come up in the wake of the same, in case, any of you too have courted this question, and/or might.

Q. Catalyst, as i know, quickens the process without itself being affected. Why is it that the omnipotent catalyst is not quickening the entire process of evolution. Why is it acting on a selective basis? It should have also affected the other living organisms. I am stretching a bit,thanx.

Well sir, I am here with the intention to share and clear the air of confusion—and satiate the query.

I am glad and grateful that you're stretching a bit, as by doing so, we stretch the limits to access the limitlessness within. Your query is very pertinent, and you're right about the catalyst. But then again, truth is relative, is contextual. The answer, as is deemed, that your query invokes, is multi-layered...and is as follows:

(i) Catalysts facilitate a reaction. True. Catalysts remain unchanged. True. Though, actually they are regenerated unchanged at the completion of the reaction, even if they incur changes in between. But the aspect of time: fastens, in physical paradigm, is not the same in the paradigm of our essence. The realm of the essence knows not time, as it is timeless essentially.

(ii) From the level of the essence we are led to the awareness that life knows only one to move: with perfection, perfectly-timed. Why otherwise, for example, "The Essence" got posted when it did, and why are we interacting in the manner we are? All is perfection in motion...everything. Though this, from the physical—the relative—plane of living, is difficult to accept, as only the apparent contradictions then hold our attention.

So, fast or slow, are misnomers, form the level of the essence.

(iii) Each soul has its own agenda. Who are we to decide what is fast and slow? In keeping with the same, and in keeping with the unique expressions of the Source that we are, we have uniquely different ways of fulfilling our agenda. This, the mind, disconnected from the Source, cannot comprehend. It thus perceives the delays and premature events.

(iv) Coming to the bias of the omnipotent catalyst, well, sir, it is not selective. Rather our truths vary, the true expressions, the true calling, though we originate from the same source. So, the processes required differs, to reach the Source and be thus fully realized as our truth of being. Now, catalysts for chemical reactions too are specifically chosen. One catalyst doesn't serve as so for all reactions.

In our case, our truth, "Who I AM," is the omnipotent catalyst. But to make it operate, we need to find it and put it in operation—by accepting it, acknowledging it and surrendering to it, with faith. The Source, whose expressions we are, is unimposing and unconditional. It never forces Its will...as we propose, so it disposes. Hence, the question is not of the omnipotent catalyst not selecting all of us, but our own selves opting to seek, find, accept and adhere to it...by surrendering to it with absolute faith, to trigger it on. 

Life is created as per our choices—conscious or unconscious. It is all about our will...to access our selves, and allow ourselves to be...to enjoy the fullness of our being...enjoy the auto catalysis...of the omnipotent truth of our being...of our essence...

My window to life opened through organic chemistry, which I have been blessed to major in, and teach the same, for close to 9 years, before finally accepting and adhering to my own truth, my true calling: writing and now I am full time into writing and editing of books. And all is God's grace.

I sincerely hope that the explanations reach and touch... And in any case, I am there always, for further queries!

Thanks once again for making me to go within, and find all that has surfaced, and has been transmitted to this space.

With regards,

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

The Essence...

Beauty of truth—of essence—one, out of innumerable: it surges and overflows, knowing fully well that all have their own unique expressions of truth and definitions too, as all are unique expressions of the Source, Which, infinite that It is, expresses in, as and through infinite forms! 

Truth of essence, as is shared, makes all to go within and find theirs, there. It is such an omnipotent catalyst. 

Sushmita Mukherjee,
June 27, 2013

Friday, March 15, 2013

Comment of moment


Each moment is complete in itself—and in completion lies its uniqueness. How otherwise one moment is different from the other? Maybe not at the gross level, yet when we choose to be engrossed in the subtle, we experience the same. Even each and every single breath is a signal different.


So actually, when we deem something incomplete that is from the gross level only. Because we proceed to some new task only when we have completed the previous (or if we are multi-tasking we take many at once, that is a different issue altogether). Though the ones which we term, incomplete, too are either by conscious choice, or unconscious choice—and thus appears perforce. Where it is stopped, the journey is deemed over of the same. What could be and would be is redundant, as are ifs and buts...more so, if we are proponents of “Whatever happens, happens for the best.”


“Old order changeth for new,” is affirmed. But when something new begins does it not imply that it has ‘come’ only because the one that was, is no longer orderly...is fully complete and saturated? Do we say that though it was incomplete, it gave in to the new order?


Does a moment, even for a moment state, “I am incomplete,” even though its existence is momentary—definition of transience it is, as the moment it is born, it is gone?


When growth stops of some form, it finds another form to grow. Thus keeps transforming moments, informing that life is an infinite garland of infinite moments, where we have landed at one unique moment, as a unique form, and would leave to at one such moment...to proceed in another different unique form... 


Sushmita Mukherjee,

March 15, 2013

Monday, January 14, 2013

Admired, is envied



Can you imagine envy and admiration to be the two sides of the same coin?

Well, I never had inkling that it was so, till I was led to realize that it indeed is so. At least for me, it is—and in no way can it be deemed absolute, as nothing is absolute, in this relative plane of life that we lead. So, we all have our own interpretations, depending on our perceptions…and over time, our own perceptions change, surrounding the same matter. At times we hail it as evolution…and times other, we refer to this change as maturity. Call what we will, but the fact of the matter is changeability is the norm, as well as forte, of life.

Thus, here I am, with my realization that envy and admiration are the two facets of the same face! And even this realization, has added on dimensions—with changes added to it—since the time it was first ‘received’.

But then, only by expressing and explaining ‘how’ one is led to a realization, completes the picture of the realization. Otherwise, simply affirming one’s observation sounds like a declaration absolute.

All realizations result out of experiences varied, and these experiences too change—with it the realizations too undergo ‘editing’. But then what does not?! Though yes, when the realization strikes, it catches one unawares. It comes as an insight, and when it does, the feelings that are evoked are inexplicable…as all feelings are. Yet, it is the genius of Wordsworth that he could capture the inexplicable, and express it so wondrously, as he has done, through the immortal lines: “The flash upon the inward eye, which is the bliss of solitude”, in his very famous work, “The Daffodils”. Indeed, these realizations do strike as flashes—on and seen, through the inner eye—unbeknownst to us.

Gradually the essence of the realization evolves…

The same has happened in the context of envy and admiration…
  
The trigger

It all began with: “Neighbor’s envy, owner’s pride”, the tagline synonymous with Onida TV. Years ago, still a kid, when I first saw the advertisement, I simply hated it. Over the years, the feelings for the same have undergone changes though. No longer is it hated, because now I know it is the creative expression of the person, whose it is. And as each being is unique, so unique would be one’s creations too. As one perceives so one creates.

Opinions might differ—and that they do, more often than not. We might not agree to some or many—as the fact is, as we perceive, so we receive and conceive…and thus we express. Hence, the response to the same differs for different people—and likewise the expression too does. Thus, the philosophy behind “Neighbor’s envy, owner’s pride”, though doesn’t share a place of pride in my consciousness, it is acknowledged as much as the creative expressions of a being, as much as it is thanked for leading me to the realizations and revelations it has.

When I first saw the advertisement as a kid, the visual effect had been nauseating. It was repulsive. I simply couldn’t agree, and thus accept it—and this manifested as my dislike for the same. And even later the dislike could not be converted to a liking for the same.

Though later, it has become more of a disagreement than dislike, transcending the visual impact. The disagreement is with the inherent philosophy of the advertisement.

The disagreement

Primarily, it ‘reaches’ me as an approach which looks to encash the negative emotions. The higher is envy-quotient, higher should be the sale-ability of what the advertisement came up to sell.

Envy is a trait which could hardly be called positive, and pride if not tempered, tampers with one’s life. And all of it is the doings of the ego. We are mistakenly consumed by ego, which we term as self-respect—many a times—as life’s thin line of demarcations are really thinner than the thinnest. It is all about following, “This far and no farther.”

Ego is felt by many as essential, but till it stays within the limits of self-respect. But to still the ego, the mind has to be stilled. It is a task, none would find enviable, and when accomplished one would not even take pride in it, as by then one would have realized that pride too is a dressage of ego!

Hence, the proud use of ‘pride’ and ‘envy’ was not acceptable to me. Little did I understand then about ‘catch lines and phrases’, which, I do now. Now the tagline is accepted, as a point of view of an individual—with every right to one’s views. But it is not the view that is accepted.

I abide by my feelings! I can’t envy anybody’s pride! And I can’t take pride in this act of not envying, as well!

The link

My esteemed readers might be wondering as to where I am wandering with these two words, and what significance does my views about an advertisement carry. But rest assured, wherever we (yes, you too, as you are reading these words!) are wandering, we are, without any envy or pride. 

But definitely with admiration for the philosophy that is unveiled to me, through the philosophy which is not even in sync with me—that of the advertisement. I admire the creativity of a creative being, through whose pen (though nowadays it is through the strokes on the keyboard!) it resulted—and made me go deep within and realize why I do not agree with, what I do not. The reason has to be there—otherwise it would be a biased view. And disagreeing doesn’t mean one has to be disagreeable. Rather now I am thankful to the advertisement, which as a kid I hated! After all, whatever happens happens with a reason behind its happening—apparent or not.

It led me to access what I could, as it led me to the fact that we end up envying what we admire…though the reverse is not true. The link between envy and admiration was thus presented to me—and I could simply accept it with gratitude, and of course, admiration. How things are right in front of our eyes, and how we see them only when we focus and refocus our vision...

And once we realize, what we realize, it all seems so very obvious, forcing us to ask ourselves, “Why didn’t I see/think the same before?”

The same is felt when the link between envy and admiration is revealed, as ‘received’. It seems so obvious now, as it is thus unveiled. Is it not true, that we usually wish to possess those qualities and things which we admire, yet others have it and we don’t? And then, when we fail to, the failure leads (or misleads?) to envy, towards the person and the possessions—material and non-material, the capabilities.

Only that which we admire, and hence like, we wish to ‘have’, and when it is a ‘have-not’, admiration is not—having swiftly given way to envy. It is just a matter of flipping the coin…over to the side that is envy.

The response

Thus, that which is admired ends up being envied. No wonder then that generally the admirable qualities are those which are rendered enviable as well.

It is more of a habitual response that we come up with. Yet can we not change it? We surely can—shift in the perspective is ‘all’ that is required. Though yes, this ‘all’ that is required is a task ‘tall’, as it requires us to come out of the deep folds of habit—and its associated comfort zone. But yes, the task it ‘not at all’ impossible—and on its attainment, it is an achievement admirable.

That which is admirable, remains admirable—it need not be enviable. As the moment it is received as enviable our plight becomes pitiable, for which none, but we ourselves are responsible. A neighbor doesn’t need to envy…and the owner is not required to take pride in owning what the neighbor envies. The choice is the owner’s, as well as that of the neighbor. One can become green with envy, and one could inflate oneself with pride—yet in both cases, ultimately, one finds oneself deflated in life.

Envy and admiration are not next door neighbors. They are residents of the same house. It is up to us, ‘who’ we call upon, and forth. Though admirable is enviable, it is not at all advisable—to envy what we admire, in case we do not ‘have’ what we admire. It contaminates the admiration.

How about acknowledging that which is admirable, as commendable instead? In fact, admiring the admirable, without any envy, is in itself admirable. So, which side of the coin would we choose: envy or admiration? To ‘win over’ life, we know which side to side with. Do we not?


Sushmita Mukherjee,
January 13, 2013


P.S. An evolved version of a blog, written three years ago, “Admirable is Enviable”.

Monday, December 31, 2012

Happy New Year

As we all gear,

To embrace another year,

May our minds be without fear,

With the message ringing loud and clear,

That we are what we are,

And our life too is as we are.

To change all that is 'without'

We have to go within, and live 'inside-out'...

Thus even when we are down, are 'out' never,

Because the mind is without fear.

So may your faces light with smiles ear-to-ear...

Not only this year...

But year after year...

Wishing you all a very peaceful New Year.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Each thing is best in its place


Each thing is best, truly, in its place. This saying of yore carries one of the core messages and the essence of life in a unique way—just as each and everything, every moment, every being in life is unique. Each one (thing) is thus the best that could be there, at that moment, at that place.

And it indeed stands to be hailed as an universal truth; while failing to understand and thus rejecting it, carries the pathogen of discord, whereby all that is different is deemed as an act of defiance (a being, being defiant) to all that one stands for—being and doing. Thus, we create a diseased life—individual, as well as collective; and societies, teeming with technological advancements are found deficient in the understanding of the technology that life is, with its own logic. Hence, the dim situation, reflecting with great intensity the ‘stand’—of one and many and at times, one too many—which stands on an understanding which requires much light.

None can replace any one…as all is…and all are unique.

Sushmita Mukherjee,
December 19, 2012.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Dhanteras


How one is led to, what one is, is never known. And that is why, when one is, the elation knows bounds none. 

 

 

It all happens because what is obvious to all might not to be some one. So it happens that it happened with me...and thanks to a friend of mine, who affirmed that what is revealed to me, is already known. Nonetheless, revelations are always welcome...and hence this one too is being shared here. No more suspense...

 

 

It is about 'Dhanteras', celebrated before Diwali, when ritualistically goodies (could be anything, many things--but not nothing!) are bought. In fact it is deemed as the 'time to shop', hopping shops! As I read (on Facebook) her wishing all "A Happy Dhanteras", the word Dhanteras struck me with the ‘Dhan’ (wealth) of an insight...and so I asked her, "Does Dhanteras stand for 'dhan tera aas'?", which means “Wealth you are hoped and wished for”. And she affirmed.

 

 

At times it felt a bit queer that to invite money into the lives, people spend money.

 

 

But now when philosophically looked at, it is realized that we draw into lives what we give, what we stand for. Life moves on the principles of natural reciprocity. When we give out love we create an ambiance of love...when we spew hatred, hatred is what we generate and get. 

 

 

So this could be the principle behind Dhanteras too.

 

 

Though again, what is the real ‘Dhan’, varies for one and all. I am thankful to Dhanteras and to my friend whose wishes led me to this ‘Dhan’ of Dhanteras...and corroborated the same...and to the moment which led me to it...and of course I am grateful for the insight....

 

 

Had it not been for Dhanteras, 'this' ‘Dhan’ I would have remained oblivious of. 

 

 

"Happy Dhanteras" to all...

 

 

Sushmita Mukherjee,

 

November 11, 2012