Yes, this question knocks, and knocks very hard, on
the doors of consciousness, even as those labeled “racists” are knocked hard
and down, with and by rejection, racism, unacceptable, under any and all
circumstances. And the word that provokes and invokes the question and insight:
“Race.”
On one hand, race
implies a competition, of any sort, and on the other, “race,” stands for the
human classification, based on various parameters: anatomical, geographical,
ethnic, cultural, linguistic, religious, and / or social affiliation
(Wikipedia). And there is found and felt an uncanny link between these two
“hands”—as if, shaking of the hands, strengthens the stand, of both.
True, racism is held and felled, for the
discrimination, atrocious, based on the color of the skin, carrying out the
atrocities—propagated by the “race,” collectively called humanity, and which
hails itself as “the” intelligent
creation of creation. Yet, the very act, of profiling, on the basis of
pigmentation is a mark, indentation of ignorance of the intelligent “race”
called humans—the very race, which is called out, implored: “Be human.”
True it also is that, there is no harm in
classifying and categorizing, but, what, if the classification is integral to claiming
supremacy of one over the other? And it is so, even classifying one’s God,
superior to That of the other, proclaiming It as the “most powerful”—and in
trying to impose one’s notion, the imposition breaches all integrity of
humanity. And this is no classified information.
Science teaches that classification makes the study
systematic and so, it indeed is. But, when that classification is used (abused
and misused?) for redemption—and of what, that, too, we do not know—what
purpose does it serve? Yes, the hands
matter that handle the tools....
We indict racism, a specific type of racism,
“chromatic racism,” that which is based on color. Yet, racism of all sorts, we
indulge in... Yes...indulge...and even in the “chromatic racism,” and thus,
thrives the cosmetic means to become fair when nature is considered unfair for
not having made one fair. Then, there is that criterion (in many parts of the
world, still) for the prospective bride / groom: Wanted, fair-complexioned...!
Well...well...the indulgence of ignorance, runs, unbound, in a race, that is perceived to be life on
the physical plane, the nomenclature of “races” presenting the lineup for the race. Thus, we conjure the race and injure ourselves, in a race to injure the other “race.”
We do not see ourselves as one “race,” “humanity,” as we do not see ourselves as the formless
essence in form, our source one. Thus, every time we speak out against anyone
and refer to as a “race” (which could be even a generalization of trait), we
are courting and quoting racism. It is a race
we have pushed ourselves into, unwittingly. Yet, we are empowered to pull
ourselves out of this race,
willingly, embracing each and all as a part, unique, of creation, beauty lying
in the diversity, bracing for a life wherein our decisions are independent of
the external parameters, independent of all generalizations and precedence....
When the “ism” of life and living is dependent on
the generalizations and perceptions based on a “race,” it is a race and 180 degrees departure from the
“ism” of life: oneness. Lost in the race of
“races,” the grace, that life is, is lost, till is regained, as we trace our
roots, charting various routes, though direction, in each case, same: inward.
So, the question haunts and taunts: Racism, what is,
and what is not?
Sushmita,
November 13, 2014
Note: Thanked is Taposhi Samanta for sharing (on
Facebook) Jiddu Krishnamurti’s definition of what is violence. The insight,
which was brewing, has been thus filtered, catalyzed by the resonance.
No comments:
Post a Comment